Tags
4th preference I-130 8 U.S.C. Section 1153 203(h)(3) 203(h) of CSPA does not limit automatic conversion and retiention of priority date to those seeking conversion of family based petitions age-out aged out ameliorative reading of CSPA amnesty avoid interpreting statutes to render any portion of the statute redundant can my child benefit under CSPA children Child Status Protection Act Client Comments come here legally Congress CSPA coverage derivative benefits as a child derivative of a petition economy election employer who refuses to pay fair wages enforcement fixes foreign workers taking American jobs go to the back of the line H-1B cap H-1B jobs H-1B limit H-1B lottery H-1B reform H-1B visas ICE immigrants immigrants compliment US workers immigrants don't take jobs away from Americans immigration immigration reform impact of immigrants on the economy In re: Kin Na Kim In re rodolfo Avila-Perez jobs Jyoti Patel legalization Matter of Cuellar de Osorio Matter of Garcia Matter of Patel Matter of Wang military motion to stay action naturalization NC Padash v. INS plain meaning of CSPA priority date retention priority date retention request recession reform unlawful presence urge the BIA to follow Matter of Garcia USCIS revised guidance on the applicability of the child status protection act visa lottery wait turn in line Wilmington
Viewing entries tagged with 'children'
"Minor" Travel? Think Again!
Posted by Jeremy McKinney on 11 March 2009 | 0 Comments
Tags: immigration, reform, amnesty, children
One of the foundations of comprehensive immigration reform is fixing a problem that Congress created in 1996 - the creation of the 3 year, 10 year, and permanent bars. The bars have created a "Catch 22" where thousands of foreign nationals are ELIGIBLE for green cards but can't obtain the card in the USA due to unlawful presence and can't go home to obtain the card because our government won't let them back in. So they stay here and stay illegal. The U.S. Consulate in CD Juarez, Mexico and our Federal Courts have now made the problem worse by declaring that the permanent bar can apply to children!!
